1/10/2024 0 Comments Doit.im vs nozbeBut it was hard for me to get a big picture overview of all the things. I went so far as to import all my project data and try to use it exclusively for a couple of weeks. Of all the apps, I spent the most time with Asana. The fiddling with setup doesn’t give a great ROI. I am not a real estate agent that need to manage sales reps, or a company with several departments that need to coordinate. Again, I am just one person wanting to collaborate with other people. If you know what you need, and have the time and money to get something tailor made exactly to those needs, it could be well worth your investment. But great power comes at an expense: the time and effort to setup your system. Some apps allow for huge flexibility in how you want to setup your stuff. Drawbacks with extremely flexible systems Or maybe it’s just me that has a problem with condensing a whole project down to a single shared list.Įxamples of personal task managers: Todoist, Doit.im, Wunderlist. While they have the possibility to share lists and add comments on tasks, I find there’s a lack of big picture overview. Project management with client access is a situation where task managers like Todoist or Wunderlist falls short, even though they have opened up somewhat to collaboration. Most personal task managers lack the concept of start dates for example. In a personal task manager, the collaborative project management aspect is less thought out. Sure some projects could be converted to super-tasks with subtasks but still.Įxamples of collaboration software: Producteev, Wimi teamwork, Teamwork, Redbooth, Mavenlink, Freedcamp. ![]() As a GTD practitioner have A LOT of small projects so that system will not work for me. They expect fewer and larger projects and thus charge based on number of projects. Some collaboration software solutions work on the project level only. And you can seldom get all your tasks displayed and sorted by label/context. My is another persons or Labels in a collaborative environment are often shared between users and therefore not suitable for contexts. Contexts, for example, are personal to the user. Recurring items or tickler file functionality with reminders are sometimes included, but not always.Īnd using collaboration software for personal GTD is hard. But it’s harder to manage the individual level of tasks. Inviting clients is easy and the whole point of the software. Many collaboration software focuses on discussion, chat, file sharing and notifications. It’s just that they didn’t solve my particular problem. They all solve a specific problem for a specific niche. But the price has to be reasonable in relation to the size and complexity of my projects. I had no idea that my criteria would be enterprise level. I am not a big enterprise and I cannot motivate huge spendings on project management software. ![]() In some cases, the features I wanted was behind a pretty steep price tag. Only a few were more extensively tested than others. For a number of apps, I very quickly realized it wasn’t what I was looking for so I abandoned it very soon after entering my test data. Do you know how many project management software exist out there? It’s a crazy jungle.įor the record, these are all the apps that I initially signed up to test. And I’m sure I only scratched the surface. The possibility for issue tracking quickly became another main criteria to look for and not just a nice bonus. Some of the solutions had specific integrations for github and/or bitbucket, and that was very attractive. Somewhere along the line I also started looking at issue tracking for development. What are the task features? Start date? Recurring? Subtasks?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |